Well, since everybody & their dog friend seems to be getting onto Google+ today ... and since in spite of the heavy supply of accounts there seems to be an even greater demand as evidenced by people selling invites to Google+ on ebay ... may be because someone joked (I think) that having a Google+ account increases your chances of getting laid by 30% ... I am writing my own initial thoughts about it.

So, what are my initial thoughts? Google is trying to stay in the game, not beat/kill/depose/extinguish/squash/frag Facebook by doing (attempting?) somethings right for a change. Somebody already wrote what Google+ learnt from Wave and Buzz. Google+ might actually be a great platform for the internal social networking needs of organizations. If they have it on Google Apps.

On a personal level, I got all excited after I got an invite and could finally get in after a harrowing commute to the office between the time I got the invite and the time I created my account ... I clicked around, added friends to circles upon circles, fooled around with settings, etc. for about 45 minutes and I lost steam a bit.

After adding 45 people to various circles I definitely got tired! And only 8 people had added me to their circles. So evidently my network of friends (both IRL & online ones) had not yet gotten into Google+. Not so cool until the network is in there. So I have to wait till more people join in. And I have yet another set of friends data.

 I sent a feedback, which is refreshingly via a form that is different from the ugly bug reporting tools developers & testers use. Well, if you want to know, I want to be able to mute/mute a person, so I don't see their updates on my timeline temporarily. That's the feedback I sent.

What I liked though is that I can export all my data on Google+ to a zip file and have it with me. Unlike Facebook.

Now the wait for Google+ to open up for developers.

Here i list some best article submission for those who want to promote their site.  I have listed with my own experience.
Note: All aritcle site listed here are dofollow, Enjoy!

1. GoArticles:
Goarticles is my favorite article submission site.
Alexa Rank: 2313
Google Page Rank: 4
Features:
Minimum words:300 words per article
Review Time: Your article will be published at once.
Backlink: Allow two backlinks( i don't know the limitation).

2.theFreeLibrary:
One of the top level and best article submission site.
Alexa Rank:2,612
Google Page Rank:7
Features:
Minimum words: 75 words per article
Review Time: within 2 days your article will be approved.
Backlink: Allow  two backlinks( i don't know the limit.  It may about 3).

3.sooperarticles
Faster approval
Alexa rank:
Google Page Rank:6
Features:
Minimum words:250
Review Time: within 24 hours( my article approved within 8 hours)
Backlink: upto 3 backlinks.

4.articledashboard:
Alexa Rank: 4625
Google Page Rank: 5
Features:
Minimum words:300 words per article
Review Time:Your article will be published within 24 hours.
Backlink: Allow three links.

5.ArticleClick:
Alexa Rank:6376
Google Page rank:4
Features:
Minimum words:400 words per article
Backlink: Only two links in articles
Review Time: It is depending upon number of articles submitted to that websites(not only your articles but also including other articles).  When i submit my article it displayed "4.5 working days for review".

6.PubArticles:
Alexa rank:5662
Page Rank:4
Features:
Minimum Characters:1000(about 300 words) per article.
Backlink: only one link in articles(that's not fair).  Also keywords is not able to customized.
Review Time: within 48 hours.

You turn the computer on, to show the newly prepared project to the Boss. It asks for the administrator’s password and you put it in… very well.

“Sorry, the password is incorrect. Please try again.“

How painful these cruel lines are for a sufferer! You are probably thinking that it is not so easy as ABC and every XYZ person doesn’t has such skills. Now open up your windows, as many know much easy ways to crack a password in minutes… whether it is the password “password” itself, or the password “ftb5@g3z.com” (a password considered ‘best’ by Microsoft Corporation’s password tool).

Here, the topic is not ‘how to hack’, but ‘how the ideology is designed behind hacking’. First thing to know is that Hackers and Crackers are two totally different characters, that are unfortunately mixed by many.

A hacker is a wise programmer, always creating new ways and innovations. He tests security. On the other hand, crackers are new programmers, with their fingers itching to write codes for destruction.
For avoiding confusion, the term ‘ethical hackers’ has been coined for the wise men.
Today, tech companies are forced to provide security patches continuously to prevent and cure the cracking alerts.

Under all possibilities, the magnificent hacking industry is on the go. A problem running parallel to the problem of computer viruses, hacking is also done for ethical purposes, by the ethical hackers. Many software companies employ ethical hackers to find and heal the security loopholes in the products.

I think that beyond ethical hacking, there must be nothing like hacking… But there is. And the ‘bad ones’ are working at a faster pace than the ethical hackers.

Taking reference from the conducted sample hacking, I recommend not to choose the same password for different accounts.
A hacked Yahoo! ID can lead the facebook ID to be hacked.
Similarly, physical access of a person to one’s computer is equally risky. By searching the registry or simply plugging in a USB stick or a live CD, at least 3-4 of your important passwords (including the O/S administrator’s password) can be obtained in minutes.
Remember, avoid logging in to any account when on a shared computer (cyber cafe etc.).

Learning by cracking is not offensive when limited to privet domains, but use of such knowledge on others is illegal… So please make, and insist to make Security the Objective and the Objective Security.